Developer Diary 21 – En Route to Rouen

August 1944: after months of hard fighting, the Allies are finally out of Normandy. In front of them, the Wehrmacht has all but disintegrated, having stood its ground up until breaking point. Supply is now the biggest concern for the Allies. Taking the large port of Antwerp will allow them to freely operate their vast armies and air forces in the months to come.

Now that the game has been officially announced, I’ve decided to change the post format for this diary a little. Previously, I focused heavily on what we were doing internally. I was giving a lot of technical info, and even airing our own doubts if the project was going to get completed at all. Big thanks to all who’ve had the patience to bear with these “developer confessions”. The new format should be much more player oriented. We will be going through concrete examples of play, the historical context, and how the game mechanics tie everything together. I hope you enjoy it!

If you’ve been reading our previous developer diaries, you’re likely already familiar with some of the key new features in Unity of Command II, like fog of war, HQ intel, and stragglers. Today we’ll show how these new features tie together to form a tight little gameplay loop, that gives an entirely new dimension to the game.

The Route Ahead

In the screenshot, US 1st Army is in position on the left bank of the Seine estuary, and is looking to jump across the river at Rouen. En route to Rouen however, they need to deal with German forces stationed around the town of Évreux.

Check out the blue dots just north of Évreux: center of the map, right behind that panzer IV. Those are stragglers: routed enemy elements trying to make their way back to their HQ. We’ve talked about the idea of stragglers in our very first dev diary. The blue icon shows their approximate strength in steps, and the orange symbol on the 3-step straggler is important – but read on.

A Peek into FoW

Usually, you want to capture enemy stragglers anyway, before the enemy gets to reorganize them and use as reinforcements. There’s an added bonus though: prisoners provide valuable intel to your HQ. After you capture a set number of stragglers (in one turn) they reveal locations of enemy units hidden within Fog of War. Let’s take a look at how that works.

In this example, first the 30th US infantry division attacks an armor kampfgruppe. The attack is successful and the enemy unit is removed from the map. It’s not completely destroyed though, and you can see the routed troops join an existing group of stragglers in the rear. To make sure they don’t reorganize, the Sherman moves in and mops up, taking prisoners and clearing the road. This results in valuable new intel, and some enemy units are located on the map, just across the river. Turns out, the road from Paris to Rouen is swarming with enemies!

As the Sherman (actually, 5th US Armored) moves in and takes the 3-step enemy straggler as prisoners, the prisoner counter on the HQ sheet (bottom right of screen) reflects this change. The prisoner target, set by HQ intel, has been reached, which means that HQ intel can now locate enemy units one hex inside fog of war. These units are shown on the map as intel markers. You also get a notification in the bottom left of the screen, just above the quick-select HQ buttons.

Tactical Choices

The stragglers mechanic not only prevents bloody, wipeout scenarios, and thus addresses one of the main issues from the original Unity of Command. It also gives you more tactical choices: attack head-on, encircle, or mop up routed enemy units?  Gather valuable intel and prepare for the next turn, or rush forward without full knowledge of what lays ahead?

Sometimes you will have to deal with stragglers simply to keep the roads open, and be able to advance. One or two steps of enemy stragglers shouldn’t be a problem. Your units are able to capture them simply by moving over them while advancing:

On the other hand, three stragglers on the map represent 5.000 to 10.000 routed and disorganized enemy soldiers, and that’s a problem that needs to be dealt with! Moving right through them will cost at least 3 movement points. Alternatively, you can go around those stragglers, but either way sometimes that means that the prize will remain just outside your reach. Here’s that same Sherman unit, in a slightly different situation, with 3 stragglers instead of 2 on the road. Notice the choice to go around or mop up:

Branching Out

How many stragglers need to be captured to reveal enemy units in FoW? Will HQ intel only reveal units close to the frontline or further away? This is all still in active testing, and we’re tweaking some of this stuff heavily.

There are further interesting tie-ins, to other game systems, but those will have to wait for another post. As a teaser, HQ intel can be upgraded as part of the campaign game, and it becomes temporarily suppressed when the HQ is out of supply or gets routed.

We’re really trying to load this one with depth folks, and I hope you all like the final product.

Take care, and AMA in comments as usual.



This entry was posted in News. Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to Developer Diary 21 – En Route to Rouen

  1. Christopher Hamilton says:

    I really like this type of detail. Is there any chance of this sort of thing being retrofitted to the original UofC, or a re-release of OofC with the new features, new scenarios, etc?

  2. I love how the fog of war seems to work, and the intel-straggler dynamic feels right! Simple abstraction of of reality = The UoC brand.

    The original UoC starts with a hard scenario. I wonder how the difficulty will be on the different maps on the western front. I’m kind of worried that allied numerical superiority make many scenarios very one-sided.

    Christopher Hamilton:
    My guess is that Tomislav will make the new map for the eastern front, but leave the scenarios and campaigns for the more creative users.
    I hope they do an eastern front add-on eventually though.

  3. Ben McGregor says:

    Amazing work! It’s good to see all the new mechanics in play and illustrated. Just curious, have you guys finalised any plans on how to implement the Independent Brigades that served with the British forces, i.e. the 6th Guards Tank Brigade and 2nd Parachute Brigade? Apologies if this has already been discussed!

  4. tom says:

    @Christopher: as Benjamin says, there will be an “official” eastern front expansion for this game eventually. It will take us a little while to work to get there though, as the war in the east was *huge*.

    @Benjamin: the west actually plays a lot better than I expected it would. That said, we need to be careful that we’re not subconsciously nerfing air attacks just to make the allied scenarios in the west more challenging 😀

    @Ben: the problem has been noted, discussed here, and I haven’t made a decision either way :/. The options are to a) simply have them be low step-count units, perhaps loaded with specialists for survivability, b) allow for splitting of division-size units at the player’s choice (this is mostly for US CCA/CCB etc) or c) not have them at all, but rather model them as 1 or 2 specialist steps.

  5. Mark Wilkinson says:

    This will be the defining wargame of the century I predict.

  6. uran21 says:

    Clearing all the map from enemy units and capturing all enemy flags was a source of fun (in many games) for completionist wargamers although not realistic. So I never looked to wipeouts as a problem. Nevertheless including unique mechanic feels refreshing and if it has significant trade-offs in decision making even better. Looking forward to try it out. Operation Compass comes to my mind instantly 🙂 I guess most of the North African theatre is not much of your interest due to focus on a divisional scale with more rather than fewer units.

    Speaking of big screenshot it was hard for me to realize which unit is selected looking only at the map (neglecting comparison screen). Town string obscures the view and I figured it is the Sherman because Pz IV is clearly indicated as aimed at. In a fraction of a second, I even thought it was HQ that was selected (but they are highlighted when unit they control is selected).

    Theater assets look weird, it reminds on C-47 with two engines more than it should have (but it is probably DC-4 instead) for tactical bombing and German fighter for strafing runs?

  7. Aaron Boyles says:

    Will there be a call out for beta testers when the time comes?

  8. glumCunt says:

    @uran I think there is an animation making the selection more visible (below) than the static image suggests.

  9. tom says:

    @Mark: yay understatement! 🙂

    @uran21: yes… though poster “glum” has a point: selection is animated, and therefore more visible than it seems. Also, map labels can be turned off, or set to “objectives only” which is what I find most practical.

    Good spotting that parent HQ is highlighted when a unit is selected ?

    Theater asset buttons are still placeholders ofc, no worries.

    @Aaron: yes, across all our channels: blog, twitter, fb, UoC1&2 steam pages and the newsletter (if subscribing to newsletters is your thing, the form is on the home page!)

  10. putin the great says:

    looking great, really looking forward to.

    it’s weird though that the moving tank feels as if animation is lacking probably due to… the tanks in civilization 6? i know it is a weird comparison, how different those games are, and how expensive animations can be, but i suppose that it is due to the 3d turn based combat and 3d board game feeling of units, and how well civ6 is animating and doing combat. it’s like changing the visuals and all the sudden being attractive to a new player base.

  11. Victor says:

    Are there any plans for a dlc with east front with russians at some point? Or is there „only“ the west front in the planing? Can’t wait for the game and the Mac port! 🙂

  12. tom says:

    @Victor: we definitely plan to cover the Eastern Front in full (in a DLC), but note that it’s really really big. It will take time, but we will get to it.

  13. Billy Bob Joe says:

    Just wondering, will the base game come with Soviet units? And if so, could they be their own faction for some Unthinkable action? (wink wink). Also, could you add the possibility of all units being able to be deployed for both sides (i.e. Americans vs British scenario). Thanks!

  14. Ruzen says:

    I wished there will be an Asian Campaign with DLC’s in the future. It will be good to see Jap/Chi

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *